Wednesday, May 28, 2008

The Traitor Among Us?

I have heard of rumors of Tubby Teddy conspiring with the USSR over the years... and with him being in the Head Lines, Touted as an American Hero..., I wondered, why has no one heard of this? and if it was true, why wasn't he at least labeled as a Traitor?
It didn't take much research to come up with USSR KGB documents confirming these rumors. But what was shocking is how public they are, yet I have never heard about it in any news paper, or TV news program? (Is there a statute of Limitations on Treason, or conspiring with the enemy?)

This Document details Senator Edward Kennedy’s Complicity and Duplicity with the Soviet Union defeat USA's and Ronald Reagan’s quest to build up the nuclear deterrent in Europe was discovered by the Times of London (News Paper) in the 1990s after the KGB files were opened.

Special Importance
Committee on State Security of the USSR
14.05. 1983 No. 1029 Ch/OV

Regarding Senator Kennedy’s request to the General Secretary of the Communist Party Comrade Y.V. Andropov

Comrade Y.V. Andropov

On 9-10 May of this year, Senator Edward Kennedy’s close friend and trusted confidant J. Tunney was in Moscow. The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Center Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov.
Senator Kennedy, like other rational people, is very troubled by the current state of Soviet-American relations. Events are developing such that this relationship coupled with the general state of global affairs will make the situation even more dangerous. The main reason for this is Reagan’s belligerence, and his firm commitment to deploy new American middle range nuclear weapons within Western Europe.
According to Kennedy, the current threat is due to the President’s refusal to engage any modification on his politics. He feels that his domestic standing has been strengthened because of the well publicized improvement of the economy: inflation has been greatly reduced, production levels are increasing as is overall business activity. For these reasons, interest rates will continue to decline. The White House has portrayed this in the media as the “success of Reaganomics.”
Naturally, not everything in the province of economics has gone according to Reagan’s plan. A few well known economists and members of financial circles, particularly from the north-eastern states, foresee certain hidden tendencies that many bring about a new economic crisis in the USA. This could bring about the fall of the presidential campaign of 1984, which would benefit the Democratic party. Nevertheless, there are no secure assurances this will indeed develop.
The only real threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations. These issues, according to the senator, will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign. The movement advocating a freeze on nuclear arsenals of both countries continues to gain strength in the United States. The movement is also willing to accept preparations, particularly from Kennedy, for its continued growth. In political and influential circles of the country, including within Congress, the Resistance to growing military expenditures is gaining strength.
However, according to Kennedy, the opposition to Reagan is still very weak. Reagan’s adversaries are divided and the presentations they make are not fully effective. Meanwhile, Reagan has the capabilities to effectively counter any propaganda. In order to neutralize criticism that the talks between the USA and the USSR are non-constructive, Reagan will grandiose, but subjectively propagandistic. At the same time, Soviet officials who speak about disarmament will be quoted out of context, silenced or groundlessly and whimsically discounted. Although arguments and statements by officials of the USSR do appear in the press, it is important to note the majority of Americans do not read serious newspapers or periodicals.
Kennedy believes that, given the current state of affairs, and in the interest of peace, it would be prudent and timely to undertake the following steps to counter the militaristic politics of Reagan and his campaign to psychologically burden the American people. In this regard, he offers the following proposals to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Y.V. Andropov:

1. Kennedy asks Y.V. Andropov to consider inviting the senator to Moscow for a
personal meeting in July of this year. The main purpose of the meeting,
according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations
regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and
more convincing during appearances in the USA. He would also like to inform you
that he has planned a trip through Western Europe, where he anticipates meeting
England’s Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and French President Mitterand in
which he will exchange similar ideas regarding the same issues.
If his proposals would be accepted in principle, Kennedy would send his representative to Moscow to resolve questions regarding organizing such a visit. Kennedy thinks the benefits of a meeting with Y.V.Andropov will be enhanced if he could also invite one of the well known Republican senators, for example, Mark
Hatfield. Such a meeting will have a strong impact on American and political
circles in the USA (In March of 1982, Hatfield and Kennedy proposed a project to
freeze the nuclear arsenals of the USA and USSR and published a book on the theme
as well.)

2. Kennedy believes that in order to influence Americans it would be important to organize in August-September of this year, televised interviews with Y.V. Andropov in the USA. A direct appeal by the General Secretary to the American people will, without a doubt, attach a great deal of attention and interest in the country. The senator is convinced this would receive the maximum resonance in so far as television is the most effective method of mass media and information. If the proposal is recognized as worthy, then Kennedy and his friends will bring about suitable steps to have representatives of the largest television companies in the USA contact Y.V. Andropov for an invitation to Moscow for the interview. Specifically, the president of the board of directors of ABC, Elton Raul and television columnists Walter Cronkite or Barbara Walters could visit Moscow. The senator underlined the importance that this initiative should be seen as coming from the American side. Furthermore, with the same purpose in mind, a series of televised interviews in the USA with lower level Soviet officials, particularly from the military would be organized. They would also have an opportunity to appeal directly to the American people about the peaceful intentions of the USSR, with their own arguments about maintaining a true balance of power between the USSR and the USA in military term. This issue is quickly being distorted by Reagan’s administration.

Kennedy asked to convey that this appeal to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union is his effort to contribute a strong proposal that would root out the threat of nuclear war, and to improve Soviet-American relations, so that they define the safety of the world. Kennedy is very impressed with the activities of Y.V. Andropov and other Soviet leaders, who expressed their commitment to heal international affairs, and improve mutual understandings between peoples.
The senator underscored that he eagerly awaits a reply to his appeal, the answer to which may be delivered through Tunney.
Having conveyed Kennedy’s appeal to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Tunney also explained that Senator Kennedy has in the last few years actively made appearances to reduce the threat of war. Because he formally refused to partake in the election campaign of 1984, his speeches would be taken without prejudice as they are not tied to any campaign promises. Tunney remarked that the senator wants to run for president in 1988. At that time, he will be 56 and his personal problems, which could hinder his standing, will be resolved (Kennedy has just completed a divorce and plans to remarry in the near future). Taken together, Kennedy does not discount that during the 1984 campaign, the Democratic Party may officially turn to him to lead the fight against the Republicans and elect their candidate president. This would explain why he is convinced that none of the candidates today have a real chance at defeating Reagan.

We await instructions.

President of the committeeV. Chebrikov

I sure hope this opens people's eyes to the length of how far a true Liberal will go to further Liberalism... and how Anti-American Liberalism is.

"Liberalism promotes the Conservation of Freedom and Liberty, while Conservatism promotes the Liberation of Freedom and Liberty"*


Friday, May 23, 2008

Thursday, May 22, 2008


How long, or how high will prices go for fuel before The People figure out who's to blame?
Seeing that "The Guilty Party" is a Reactionary group, rather than a Proactive group... will they let this upward spiral in prices get to the point of being so obvious of who is to blame, or react to "Fix" this problem... before their dirty little secret is out... or under stood by the average Joe.
You would think that any business owner would understand how this works with "Supply and Demand"... and being that some 80% of the GNP comes from "Small Business" that the Out Cry from the masses would be pointed at Capitol Hill, rather than "Big Oil"? Or is this 45th hearing (since the early 1990's) in front of Congress about Fuel pricing is a smoke screen and just for show? Like the trained Bear on a movie set... pretending to be beaten by the Hero?

Why is this happening? How do these "Leaders" get in office, and then get re-elected... over and over? and more importantly, why does the public fall for their blatant lies? They don't even try and hide them... it's like a cheesy movie with the villain lying their way to the top, wile everyone in the audience can see it... but the people on screen can't?
Are they ignoring the obvious? or denying it? "De-nyal an't Just a River in Egypt you know". Is this a symptom of the group or Heard mentality? Blindly following the Pied Piper... right off the cliff! And, we, the audience, has to sit and watch this happen... wile yelling at the screen, and hoping they will hear us.

I saw this list on the web:

*Over the past 30 years:

  • Which party blocked the development of new sources of petroleum?--
  • Which party blocked drilling in ANWR?-- Democrat
  • Which party blocked drilling off the coast of Florida?-- Democrat
  • Which party blocked drilling off of the east coast?-- Democrat
  • Which party blocked drilling off of the west coast?-- Democrat
  • Which party blocked drilling off the Alaskan coast?-- Democrat
  • Which party blocked building oil refineries?-- Democrat
  • Which party blocked clean nuclear energy production?-- Democrat
  • Which party blocked clean coal production?-- Democrat
*source: Gatewaypundit

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Democratic or Democrat?

I think it was just a few years ago, I remember someone on the radio (Talk Radio), talking about how the Democrats where going out of their way to promote, but behind the scenes, to have everyone refer to the "Democrat Party" as the "Democratic Party", Sort of a subliminal advertising scheme. Well, it appears to have worked! I constantly hear all of our Conservative friends call them "The Democratic Party". COME ON GUYS (and Gals)... Wake Up! You have fallen under their spell... you have been sucked in... Screwed, Glued and Tattooed... and you didn't even get a kiss first... nor was "K-Y" offered!
Get it Strait! and Correct your Blunder and awake from this Gorge Orwellian Nightmare!

You can always spot a "LIB"

Something I have always wondered about... Have you ever noticed how Democrat's cars are always defaced with bumper stickers? Particularly not on the bumpers? Whether its a beat up Corolla, or an expensive "Slaab", they have stickers all over the place. You would think that a person driving a beat up car wouldn't care, but a person who has an expensive car? Have you ever tried removing these? It just doesn't make sense to me... but who am I to criticize? right?
Has anyone else noticed this phenomena?

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

"Don't Blame Me"

Well... she won big in West-By God-Virginia... Is it buyers remorse? Could it be that the real Democrats are really much too conservative for Mr. Obama? The Elite or Egg-Head Left and the Main Stream Media are trying to ram him down America's throat... These Idealists... who think that Communism was the best thing since sliced bread, really have their heads in the clouds! I thought I would never say it, but at least with Hillery, you know what you are getting. Maybe Ann Coulter has something?
John McCain with his Cap and Trade will kill Trade... and might as well ask Al Inconvenient Gore to be his VP running mate.
Why are these Limousine Liberals so attracted to Carl Marx? Why is the media also attracted? If we look at history, these would be the first people that would be dealt with in a social revolution, Like the French or the Russians. Just like the uproar with Terrorists... "They are parents to"... they wouldn't hesitate to whack them in a blink of an eye. Are they that naive? or that much of (supposed) Educated Elite's that they are above it all? You really have to wonder about their mental stability.
Things are getting scary out there! As well as frustrating!

Monday, May 5, 2008

Communism, but by any other name?

The Conservatives or Right, accuse the Left of being Un-Patriotic… why?
What is the reasoning behind these accusations?
The Left say they are Pro American… but in reality, their actions speak louder than words.

If we look at the comparison below of the Ten Planks of Communism verses The United States Constitution, we see that Liberalism, or as they like to call it now, Progressivism, is, in fact classical Marxist...

Karl Marx was stating in the Communist Manifesto that these planks will test whether a country has become communist or not. If they are all in effect and in force the country IS communist. Communism, but by any other name?

The gullible and naive American public has believed the lies of their "leaders" who they have sold out Our country to anti-Christian, anti Jew, anti religion, anti-American statutes and regulations on the federal, state, and local levels

· Abolition of private property and the application of all rent to public purpose.
The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868) and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management.
· A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
Misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State "income" taxes. We call it "paying your fair share".
· Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
We call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.
· Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
We call in government seizures, tax liens, Public "law" 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of "terrorists" and those who speak out or write against the "government" (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process.
· Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
We call it the Federal Reserve which is a credit/debt system nationally organized by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
· Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the State.
We call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver's licenses and Department of Transportation regulations.
· Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
We call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture. As well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.
· Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
We call it the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two "income" family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920's, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000.
· Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
We call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public "law" 89-136.
· Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. etc.
People are being taxed to support what we call 'public' schools, which train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based "Education”.

Source:, Forest Glen Durland

Thursday, May 1, 2008

No Basis For those Kind of Profits

Wow... Karl Marx would be proud...

Hillery on O'Riley... (another soft ball thrown). Hillery stated that yes, she believed we should have the Gas Tax Holiday this summer... but that we would pay for it with a Winn-Fall Profit tax on the Oil companies.

In other words, we are still being taxed on Gas... we just might feel like we are getting a Holiday.

She also made the scary point that the Oil companies have no basis for these record profits they are recording... are you kidding? Yet the Federal Government gets a large chunk of the profits... plus they excise more tax at the pump... they make TWICE what the oil companies make on a gallon of gas... Twice! So if Big Oil is setting record profits... the Fed is getting record Tax revenues... right?

The Stupidity... or the Belligerent Stupidity is defining!

If we keep taking the incentive away by taxing the Badjezus out of them... they won't produce as much... or bother finding new sources, or finding better ways to use old sources. And... adding in the "Trickle Down" or Regan model of economics, other industries will be De-incentived... which means less jobs...less pay... Lower GNP... Recession... Depression (and not the kind Prozac takes care of)...

Does anyone remember the Soviet Union? The only reason some of the population performed was either out of fear of the Gulag or Death... or the Black market/Capitalism that was pervasive throughout.

I have met people that grew up during that socialist time... their work ethic sucks. They don't understand going that extra mile to help a customer... or boss.

There are plenty of theories why, but if it didn't matter how hard or not hard they worked, they would be paid the same, get to keep their job, no matter what performance they exhibited...

We see this in the states with the welfare system... just stay home, have babies, don't get married and you can do pretty well.

I found myself yelling a the TV last night... and my wife telling me to shut up, she cant hear.

So get this... with Hillery, I... my wife and I would be looking at 8% to 16% more taxes!

Let's lay this out... So, you make $250,000 a year... you are "Rich", out of that, you are already paying around 30% in taxes, or $75,000! (Ouch! this hurts just thinking about it!) Now, Hillery comes to the rescue... add 8%, or $20,000 more? or 16%... $40,000 or more? Why work so hard when I could make half of that and bring home about 90% of my 1/2 pay? Does this make sense to anyone?

No wonder there was a revolution in 1776...

Something has to stop, or "Change"...